Colorado good-faith exam for med spas
Requirements for the good-faith examination before treatment. Below are the Colorado rules that govern it, each linked to its primary source.
Good-faith examination in Colorado
⚠️ read the limit on this section first. article 240 imposes no pre-treatment examination requirement — but the Colorado Medical Board’s rules (3 CCR 713) are published on a host whose robots.txt disallows the rule-display endpoint, so WE HAVE NOT READ THEM and claim no absence about them. What follows is what the STATUTE provides.
⚠️ ARTICLE 240 imposes no pre-treatment examination duty. The Colorado Medical Practice Act was surveyed in full for this entry. Its only uses of “physical examination” are in § 12-240-125, where the BOARD compels an examination of a licensee and restricts the use of the results; its only uses of “good faith” are a board examiner’s findings and a reporting immunity; and “physician-patient” appears only as a reference to the evidentiary privilege. No provision requires a history, examination, diagnosis or treatment plan before prescribing or treating. ⚠️ read that strictly — it is a statement about ARTICLE 240, not about Colorado: the Medical Board’s rules at 3 CCR 713 sit on a host whose robots.txt disallows the rule-display endpoint, and no absence is claimed for them.
Colo. Rev. Stat. art. 240 of tit. 12, surveyed in full; the examination provisions are at § 12-240-125 · verified Sep 2, 2026
The general standard is a single ground with no injury requirement: “Any act or omission that fails to meet generally accepted standards of medical practice” is unprofessional conduct. Colorado states the duty at that level of generality rather than enumerating steps, which means a med spa is measured against prevailing practice rather than against a checklist it can complete.
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 12-240-121(1)(j) · verified Sep 2, 2026
Telemedicine is inside the definition and outside any discount. “The delivery of telemedicine” is itself the practice of medicine, and separately “any act or omission in the practice of telemedicine that fails to meet generally accepted standards of medical practice” is its own ground for unprofessional conduct. The remote consult is medicine and is held to the same standard.
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 12-240-107(1)(g); § 12-240-121(1)(aa) · verified Sep 2, 2026
The prescribing ground is framed by PURPOSE rather than by procedure: “Administering, dispensing, or prescribing any habit-forming drug or any controlled substance … other than in the course of legitimate professional practice” is unprofessional conduct. “In the course of legitimate professional practice” is where a Colorado prescribing dispute is actually decided.
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 12-240-121(1)(c) · verified Sep 2, 2026
Recent Colorado changes
Get Colorado changes as they publish
We scan the Colorado legislature and licensing boards daily, plus the FDA and the Federal Register. Free weekly Brief — what changed, in plain language, with the source.
Free · unsubscribe in one click · we never sell your address
See all Colorado rules on the Colorado compliance hub →
MedSpaRadar is regulatory monitoring and reference: it summarizes public laws, regulations and agency actions and links each to its source. It is not legal, medical, or compliance advice, and using it creates no attorney-client relationship. A summary can lag its source or leave out detail, and monitoring itself can be interrupted — so an absence of alerts means nothing reached you, not that nothing happened. Read the cited source, check its effective date, and confirm any change to your operations or clinical practice with qualified health-law counsel and your medical director.