Scope check
Who may lawfully perform this, in this state?
Checked against the rule the state actually wrote down — quoted, cited, and linked at source. This compares a procedure against a published limit; it is not a judgement about what a treatment does to skin, and it is not legal advice.
Our scope corpus holds rules read at source for 51 states across 9 service categories. Coverage is uneven and we show you which you are in on every answer. Where we have not read a rule we say so — we never treat our silence as the state's permission.
Arizona · Chemical peel · Rule on record
We have read and cited this state's own rule for chemical peel. The verdict below rests on that text, linked at source so you can verify it.
AZ gates on peel depth, which was not supplied.
Arizona draws the line at tissue depth and adds a product-sourcing condition: commercially available products only, and no mixing outside the manufacturer’s instructions.
- AZ permits up to "Superficial" for Esthetician. Supply the product's own depth designation — we will not infer depth from a percentage.
- Remove only the non-living uppermost layer (epidermis); no technique affecting the dermal layer.
- Our text for this rule was read at an accurate republisher, not from the regulator, so its currency is unconfirmed; confirm with the state board or counsel before relying on it.
The rule this rests on
A licensee shall remove only the non-living, uppermost layer of skin, known as the epidermis, by any method or means and only for the purpose of beautification; shall not use a skin removal technique or practice that affects the dermal layer of the skin; shall not mix or combine skin removal products except as required by manufacturer instructions and approved by the FDA; and shall use only commercially available products for the removal of epidermis for the purpose of beautification.
Ariz. Admin. Code § R4-10-112(P) · verified 2026-08-29 · citation of record · read at Cornell Legal Information Institute
MedSpaRadar is regulatory monitoring and reference: it summarizes public laws, regulations and agency actions and links each to its source. It is not legal, medical, or compliance advice, and using it creates no attorney-client relationship. A summary can lag its source or leave out detail, and monitoring itself can be interrupted — so an absence of alerts means nothing reached you, not that nothing happened. Read the cited source, check its effective date, and confirm any change to your operations or clinical practice with qualified health-law counsel and your medical director.
Where the corpus is deep, and where it isn’t
Read this before you rely on a quiet answer. A category with few states behind it is a category where we will more often tell you we don’t know — which is the correct answer, and not the same as a green light.
| Procedure | States with a rule on record |
|---|---|
| Injectable (neuromodulator, dermal filler) | 46 |
| Energy device (laser, IPL, RF, plasma, ultrasound) | 39 |
| Microneedling / collagen induction | 38 |
| Hair removal (laser / IPL) | 35 |
| Chemical peel | 34 |
| Micropigmentation / permanent makeup | 34 |
| Mechanical exfoliation (dermaplaning, microdermabrasion) | 33 |
| Sclerotherapy | 29 |
| Body contouring (cryolipolysis, RF, ultrasound) | 17 |
Every rule behind these answers is read at an official source and cited. The wider cited corpus — supervision, good-faith exams, ownership and CPOM, advertising — lives on the state pages, and how we decide what to publish is written down in the methodology.
Get regulatory changes as they publish
We scan all 50 state legislatures daily, plus the FDA and the Federal Register. Free weekly Brief — what changed, in plain language, with the source.
Free · unsubscribe in one click · we never sell your address