MONITORFEDAesthetic InjectablesJul 25, 2026

FDA import refusal: Acid, Hyaluronic, Intraarticular (Sweden)

FDA refuses entry of hyaluronic acid from Sweden for unknown violations.

What changed & why it matters

Med Spa Radar recorded an FDA import refusal at the federal level, dated July 25, 2026, in the Aesthetic Injectables category.

An import refusal marks a shipment the FDA stopped at the U.S. border as violative — the gray-market corridor a med spa must never source injectables from. Foreign, unapproved, or misbranded product refused at import is exactly what surfaces when a practice buys outside verified US-licensed 503A/503B or FDA-registered channels.

Type
FDA Import Refusal
Jurisdiction
Federal
Category
Aesthetic Injectables
Recorded
July 25, 2026

What this means for your specific practice — the exact step to take, the deadline to calendar, or the supplier detail to check — is in the member "what to do" below. This page is the free record of what changed and why it matters.

What to do

Free weekly Brief

Get the changes that matter in plain English, every week — and be alerted when the rules move. No charge.

Members get the full “what to do” on every alert — in real time, for your states. Become a member →

The FDA record

Firm
Q-MED AB
Origin
Sweden, Sweden
Product
Acid, Hyaluronic, Intraarticular
FDA classification
Orthopedics Medical Devices
Refused
Jul 25, 2026
FDA district
Division of Southeast Imports
Firm FEI
3044293998
FDA shipment ID
1FX-7865512-2/10001/1A

Why FDA refused it

  • Misbranding502(o), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING

    It appears the drug or device is not included in a list required by Section 510(j), or a notice or other information respecting it was not provided as required by section 510(j) or 510(k).

  • Adulteration501(f)(1)(B), 801(a)(3); ADULTERATION

    The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that the device appears to be a Class III device and does not appear to have in effect an approved application for premarket approval pursuant to Section 515 of the Act, or an exemption pursuant to Section 520(g)(1).

  • Misbranding502(o), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING

    The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded as defined in section 502(o) of the FD&C Act. It appears that it was manufactured, prepared, propagated, compounded, or processed in an establishment not duly registered under section 510 of the Act.

  • Misbranding502(o), 801(a)(3); MISBRANDING

    It appears the device is subject to listing under 510(j) and the initial distributor has not registered as required by 21 CFR 807.20 (a)(5).

FDA charge codes on this record: 118 (Misbranding) · 237 (Adulteration) · 3280 (Misbranding) · 341 (Misbranding). Definitions via the FDA Refusal Charges Reference.

Verify at FDA

FDA doesn’t publish a page per refusal. Open the FDA Import Refusals database and search by shipment ID 1FX-7865512-2/10001/1A (or firm FEI 3044293998), refused Jul 25, 2026.

FDA Import Refusal · FDA Import Refusals databaseFDA record · Q-MED AB · Sweden · medical device · refused as misbranding, adulteration

Related alerts

Monitoring, not legal advice.